IBM Takes Majority Control of Hyperledger Blockchain Steering Board

IBM has doubled the number of its employees on the technical steering committee (TSC) of Hyperledger according to an announcement by the TSC last week. IBM now holds six out of the eleven committee seats which has raised concerns about the tech giant’s new found influence on the enterprise blockchain consortium.

Of the six IBM employees: five work for IBM directly and one seat is occupied by Mark Wagner, a senior principal engineer at the IBM subsidiary Red Hat. In 2018, the TSC had only two IBM representatives and the same number of total seats. Wagner was serving on the committee at the time, but IBM did not acquire Red Hat until July 2019. The new committee will begin governing following the election of the new TSC chair next week.

The Hyperledger TSC is responsible for creating working groups to focus on technical issues, approving projects and reviewing updates. Although IBM has been a major player in Hyperledger since its inception, the results are making many from rival firms uneasy as IBM will now have the numbers to steer the committee in its favor.

At stake is the direction of one of the three most widely adopted enterprise blockchain platforms, the others being R3’s Corda and variants of the Ethereum blockchain. 

Low voter turnout was also raised as a reason to mistrust IBM’s dominance on the committee, with only 33 percent of Hyperledger members casting ballots.

IBM has not yet offered any comment.

Image via Flickr

Hedera Hashgraph’s Launches New Consensus Service Which Could Be Leveraged by IBM’s Hyperledger Fabric

Hedera Hashgraph released its Hedera consensus service (HCS), which can be used by external centralized applications, including IBM’s Hyperledger Fabric. Hedera Hashgraph’s governance board includes Boeing, Deutsche Telekom, IBM, Nomura, and recently, Google.

Hedera aims to have 39 governing council members and to be permissionless in the future. Currently, only 11 council members operate nodes with write permissions. Prior to the launch of the platform, the firm raised $124 million through a token sale. Its unique technical architecture makes it more efficient and scalable than most blockchains. 

With the Hedera consensus service, external parities could also have access to the service and are open to developers on the Hedera mainnet. Hyperledger Fabric could also use the Hedera consensus service in determining the timestamp and order of transactions. As IBM is one of the members of Hedera’s governing council, the whitepaper was written with one of the members of the IBM Blockchain team.

Leemon Baird, the Co-founder of Chief Scientist of Hedera Hashgraph said, “Logging transactions in the exact order they occur is crucial to use cases across nearly every industry. HCS combines hashgraph’s fast, fair, and secure consensus algorithm with the trust and governance of Hedera’s public network.” 

According to Hedera, the service can also be used for a private Corda or Ethereum network. The use of a public consensus is beneficial to most small private networks, given that in private blockchain networks, the lack of decentralization could lead to collusion. Hedera’s split of its consensus service from its smart contract service brings more of an advantage when it comes to efficiency.

Image via Shutterstock

China Unveils Blockchain Services Network Aimed to Build Ecosystem Along with Hyperledger, Ethereum and EOS

China’s Blockchain Services Network (BSN), ChinaChain has been opened for commercial use after six months of internal testing. As large gatherings are banned during the coronavirus pandemic, a virtual press conference was held on Saturday in Beijing for the unveiling of the BSN project. 

Blockchain.News previously reported that the Chinese government’s State Information Center revealed its plans for its national Blockchain Service Network (BSN), aiming to provide small businesses and individuals to operate blockchain applications easily without using a private blockchain network. The service aims to lower costs, estimated that hosting a Dapp will only cost RMB 2000-3000 a year, approximately $260 – $390 USD.

The Blockchain Services Network is built by a consortium of China’s biggest corporations including telecommunications companies and banks, connecting nodes in 128 cities in the country. Companies including China Mobile, China UnionPay, and Huobi China have also taken part in the creation of the BSN. The network also includes 7 areas outside of China including Paris, Sydney, San Paulo, Singapore, Tokyo, Johannesburg, and California. This would facilitate the interested parties to conduct business in China to be able to use the network and to follow the network’s rules. 

Hyperledger Fabric, Ethereum, EOS, ChainSQL, WeBank’s FISCO BCOS, and Baidu’s Xuperchain are also planned to be added to the “ecosystem play,” and “internet environment,” as explained by Zhiguang Shan, the Chairman of the BSN’s Development Association. This network of blockchains will be available for those who are interested to take part in it, including small to medium-sized businesses.

Image via Shutterstock

Blockchain Interoperability—What are the Key Drivers?

Blockchain Interoperability, the ability for independently developed blockchains to connect to other blockchains and work together within the same ecosystem, is an increasingly desirable function amongst developers . But is it necessary to have interoperable blockchains? What problems do they solve and what are the various challenges involved in interconnecting blockchains?

Blockchain today is often likened to the Internet of the 90’s. As with the Internet, Blockchain has also seen its share of people who predicted its doom within a few years of its launch. But, like the Internet, Blockchain has weathered the storm and has moved into a phase of mainstream adoption. Blockchain is no longer seen as just a toy in the hands of a few crypto-geeks, but has gained the interest of big business.

Enterprise blockchains today could be compared to the state of business applications in the late nineties, when firms ran tailor-made applications for Finance, Supply Chain, and Customer Management in their data centers. These applications hardly interacted with each other. Then, the phase of ERP systems started, where all the business needs were packed into a single monolithic application. Later we moved back to having distinct applications for specific requirements, but this time, they were built to work together seamlessly with each other as if it were a single application.

As Blockchain interoperability has clear benefits, should companies start working on them right away? In this author’s opinion, the answer is “No”. Businesses should first understand what they are getting into, assess how their needs can be met by this new technology, and specifically what are the risks involved. Blockchains can be integrated in many ways – transferring digital assets from one network to another or transferring assets in one network while paying for it in another. Integrating multiple blockchains can be technologically challenging and the companies exploring the possible integrated blockchains, should not ignore the business and the legal difficulties.

What are the business considerations for an interoperable blockchain?

Clarity on the Use Case

Most often, companies indulge in new technology because of the fear of missing out. Instead, they need to determine the use cases where the integrating blockchain networks can add value. For instance, businesses using Enterprise Blockchains for managing their supply chain processes may choose to explore Corda for trade finance. 

Incentives

What are the companies getting in return for sharing their valuable data with parties outside their network? Why should they be honest with the data they share? Monetary incentives will drive the companies, to be honest. Incentives also increase the cross-chain adoption. For instance, in a gig economy, if company A uses the background checks done by company B to fast track their employee onboarding, paying Company B for its service would encourage company B to share their data.

Governance

Preparing a governance model for different blockchain networks to work together is not an easy task. These networks might not have the same blockchain platform. For instance, digital assets transferred on a Hyperledger network, might be paid on the Bitcoin network. Public blockchains commonly have less stringent governance than the private ones. And private networks tend to have a closed governance ecosystem. Bridging the gap in the governance models of these networks is vital to building trust.

Legal and Regulatory compliance

Managing compliance across networks is a hard task. The laws and regulations that these blockchains have to adhere to increases with their geographies. Careful consideration of the applicable laws – Anti-money laundering, KYC, Antitrust, IP rights, and data privacy – across jurisdictions is essential. A bank on one blockchain platform might rely on the KYC checks done by another bank on another interconnected blockchain platform for a firm before granting them loans. Hence, adhering to compliance is crucial for interoperable blockchains as one network might rely on the compliance checks done by the other.

What are the Technology challenges to be addressed for interoperable enterprise blockchains?

Data Standards

Does “apples” in application A means “apples” in application B as well? This is always a concern when integrating different applications. Blockchain is no different. “Users” in blockchain A might mean “accounts” in blockchain B and “nodes” in blockchain C. Hence, it is necessary to have a common data dictionary for the interconnected ecosystem. Standardized data shared between the blockchain platforms leaves little room for error and increases its credibility. Besides, this reduces the technical challenges involved in integrating disparate blockchain systems.

Data Privacy and Security

Every blockchain network will have different data privacy and security standards. If a private blockchain has to interact with a public blockchain, is it possible to have agreeable data privacy standards? If a blockchain with three nodes has to interact with a blockchain with 100 nodes, is it possible to have the same security standards? How will one network trust another to maintain the same privacy and security standards? It is always beneficial to have a higher degree of security implemented in the system. Meeting the required data privacy needs is vital for the success of this newfound synergy between blockchains.

Interoperability

The next concern to be addressed is how to share data between these disparate networks. The whitepaper from World Economic Forum provides options for blockchain interoperability varying from using cross-authentication mechanisms to APIs depending on the type of blockchains being integrated. 

Smart Contracts and Shared Consensus

Every blockchain platform uses different languages to write smart contracts. Some blockchain applications such as bitcoin do not have smart contracts. How do we ensure all the blockchain networks are agreeing to the same terms and conditions? How do we ensure the order of transactions in each blockchain network is the same? It is vital for all blockchains to have the same terms and conditions coded into their smart contracts. At the same time, using an independent ordering service will ensure all the blockchains have the same order of transactions.

What is the work currently going on?

Many big players, in the Blockchain ecosystem, are realizing the necessity as well as the complexity of blockchain interoperability. The World Economic Forum has included an interoperability module into its recently released toolkit, which guides the development of new Blockchain solutions.

In conclusion, interoperable business blockchains will unlock new potential use cases. But, the difference in business requirements, technology preferences, ideas of incentivization, and compliance requirements makes it difficult for using a single type of blockchain for every use case. There is no one-size-fits-all with Blockchain. A balance between trust, security, governance, and standards will enable the seamless flow of information between diverse blockchain networks.

Tel Aviv Stock Exchange To Launch Blockchain Based Securities Lending Platform

The Tel Aviv Stock Exchange (TASE) has announced it will be launching a blockchain-based platform that will enhance digital securities transactions and sharing.

TASE, the only stock exchange in Israel said that it began testing the blockchain-based solution in March and it is on course to be officially launched in November. The blockchain platform is a centralized solution that uses Decentralized Ledger Technology (DLT) of Hyperledger Sawtooth. The platform will facilitate peer-to-peer sharing of data among financial organizations which will help remove the need for further transaction reconciliation.

The TASE blockchain innovation is the first of its kind in the country. Commenting on the exchange’s strides, Orly Grinfeld, EVP and Head of Clearing at TASE said;

“The Tel Aviv Stock Exchange is proud to present this first-of-a-kind lending pool, a safe, cutting-edge, and state of the art platform. The Blockchain technology will present a new level of safety for securities lending and will support growth for transactions based on this new platform. TASE is a global financial innovation leader, and strategically pursues the technological advancement of the capital market.”

Prior to this time, there has been a huge demand for the lending ecosystem in Israel which is basically facilitated by the banks. The proposed blockchain-based platform will help to serve the teaming financial agents across the country.

Israel Churning Out Innovative Blockchain Solutions

As a viable means to tag along in the dynamic growth of global blockchain-based innovations, Israeli startups are turning out to model blockchain to meet societal needs. Among this innovation is that from an Israeli based blockchain startup that developed a new technology that could prevent the loss of funds caused by human error when sending Bitcoins or other cryptocurrencies.

As the coronavirus pandemic also raged back in March, Samsung partnered with Israel’s Credorax to launch an automated blockchain payment platform with the capability to enhance settlement solutions. The state of blockchain integration amongst Israeli institutions and blockchain enthusiasts may be enhanced with this great blockchain solution being rolled out.

Exit mobile version